in pursuit of colour

Autotype of baby c 1900 courtesy of Felix Russo

Toronto. A Happy July 4th to our American friends! Here’s to a super year down south!

Colour photography is an interesting  topic. Those of us who form the smart phone brigade, are used to colour as a norm and black and white as a special feature for stills and videos. It wasn’t always so. From the beginnings of photography as we know it, in 1839 to mid last century, black and white was the norm.

How we see colour was postulated before photography, in 1802 by Thomas Young and refined by Hermann von Helmholtz. We call their theory today, the Young-Helmholtz theory. Their theory remained just that until it was validated by James Maxwell in 1861 with the help of photography. It was astounding that Maxwell’s demonstration even worked give the insensitivity of photographic media to certain colour bands back then.

With Maxwell’s pivotal experiment in hand, a young Frenchman named du Hauron proceeded to describe how just about any colour process would work. By the turn of the last century, the idea of tiny colour filters on a black and white glass negative evolved to the point where such concepts were marketable (eg, Autochrome by the Lumiere Brothers).

To improve speed and resolution, photographers resorted to exposing three black and white plates, each through a different filter. This approach was limited to still life, of course. To over come this barrier, cameras were concocted that exposed three plates simultaneously each through a different filter.

Regular cameras could shoot colour after the tri-pack film was created. Around 1935, Kodachrome became available and the quality resolution returned, but only if transparencies were made. Colour film was still abysmally slow. Mid last  century, colour negative film offered colour prints but initially resolution was poor. So poor that an embossed design was resorted to masking the resolution issue. Later last century print quality improved so much that colour became the norm.

Movies were a strong influence on colour with various tones and technicolor processes evolving. But even by mid last century colour was too expensive to be used for regular feature length movies. And today, we use super tiny filters over the pixels in our smart phones and digital cameras to create the illusion of colour. Autochrome anyone?

 

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on in pursuit of colour

minute men

October 1934 ad for the ‘Camerette” photography kit.

Toronto. Old P.T. was tagged as saying, “There’s a sucker born every minute“. If not, how could the old Popular Mechanics ads attract anyone? Take for example this October, 1934 advertisement they ran aimed at all wannabe photographers: For a measly 35 cents US (or 50 cents in Canada – another 15 cents up  here in the frozen north). Plus 10 cents for “shipping and handing”. And how can you order a ‘kit’ when no address is noted? Write the magazine, perhaps.

Real photographers will see this ad offers a cheap box camera, contact printer, film, chemical powders, and paper. The camera makes negatives ‘not quite 2″ x 1-1/4″‘ – kinda tiny for these old eyes. No mention of the lens sharpness, elements, etc.  Eye balling the camera and the contact printer hints that the camera too is tiny. The text for the advertisement is entirely marketing – very little hard information but lots of vague statements and glowing comments that the naive reader can interpret favourably and be impressed.

The camera itself was made by Yen-Kame in Japan and took ONE shot on a piece of cut film in a paper holder – no winder (Kodak usually placed their winder on the side hidden in the ad). So when the ad says “complete with four films”, it means four shots! Ironically, the cameras were popular in the 1930s and post war, and were worth about $20 – $30 US a couple of decades ago to collectors according to McKeown’s 2001-2002 price guide.

My thanks to my old friend George Dunbar, who once again has delved into photographic history back in the days when everyone tried to raise interest in the unwashed majority to invest in our art, deep in the greatest depression to ever hit the modern world.

Posted in history | Tagged , , | Comments Off on minute men

In the Wake of Progress

In the Wake of Progress, Ed Burtynsky courtesy the Toronto Star

Toronto.  I first saw/heard about the work of Edward Burtynsky when his 2006 movie called, “Manufactured Landscapes” was shown that fall at TIFF. The film was introduced by its director, Jennifer Baichwal. Between a ticket mess-up and volunteers who were supposed to let those in line and ‘ticketless’ in to use the empty seats and didn’t, I ended up seeing this amazing film alone.

A few years later I saw one of his “Three Gorge Dam” prints in person at the AGO, narrated by PHSC member and now retired Curator of Photography (AGO), Maia Sutnik. This was at the February, 2009 meeting held at the AGO and titled, “A Night at the Gallery (AGO)“.

PHSC President Lewko (Clint) Hryhorijiw sent me this link to a Toronto Star column titled, “Edward Burtynsky’s ‘In the Wake of Progress’ lets visitors get up close to nature’s destruction” by Sue Carter in last Thursday’s Toronto Star.

 

 

 

 

Posted in activities-other | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on In the Wake of Progress

a Kodak challenge in 1934

The Kodak SIX-20 Challenge

Toronto.  This challenge may simply spark curiosity or indifference with the smart phone crowd, who shoot full colour indoors and out; be it sunny or gloomy; on subjects close and far (and all things in-between) then casually send the best views instantly to friends near and far!

The Kodak advertisement in the August, 1934 Popular Mechanics magazine said, “Compare this 1934 Kodak with your present camera”. The ad introduced the then new Kodak SIX-20 line of cameras. A few years later, my dad bought it’s less expensive junior version to capture his first born (me).

My thanks to my good friend and fellow PHSC member, George Dunbar, for sharing this advertisement with us. What a great reminder of the days when we relied on those terribly  slow old films and a snappy folder camera fresh from Kodak in Rochester or Kodak Heights in Mount Denis.

My dad used his SIX-20 folder for most of his life. I later bought him a Polaroid and then an Instamatic, but neither camera was as satisfying to him as his old folder! Oh, yes. All the best for a Happy Canada Day (Canada was established as a Dominion in 1867).

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on a Kodak challenge in 1934

national (USA) camera day

Studio camera, Ross of London, mahogany, brass, bellows, c.1880, 6 x 4 in., $270.
Photo: Thomaston Place Auction Galleries

Toronto. For a price, Kovels will gladly show you the latest prices for antiques – including those of a photographic nature. Yesterday, June 29th, was known down south as ‘National Camera Day‘ and celebrated as such by Kovels. As far as I can see, Canada does not celebrate June 29th – but you never know …

Shown at left is a beautiful example of a c1880 view camera by Ross of London, England. Lens extra …

The camera was made of wood and brass when the cameras where usually used on a tripod to get a jiggle free result. This camera uses 6×4 glass plates, in the era of dry plate photograph, less than a decade away from early roll film technology..

Kovels graciously show prices and sources for the images reproduced in their post celebrating June 29th.

Thanks to author, sports photographer, collector, PHSC member and more, Les Jones,  for suggesting the National Camera Day page at Kovels.

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on national (USA) camera day

summer in the city

Summer 2022 PhotoEd magazine, Toronto

Toronto. Editor Rita Godlevskis just keeps on creating these wonderful issues! Great work Ms Godlevskis! Rita is the person in charge (editor) at PhotoEd magazine.

Take a few minutes and browse all the amazing talent on display. There is both a print magazine and an online magazine. If the print magazine is not on your newsstand any longer, subscribe and have it mailed directly to you.

Note. This note uses the same title as a song sung here by Joe Cocker, “Summer in the City“. I remember hearing it as a youth on long hot summer days.

Posted in magazine | Tagged , , | Comments Off on summer in the city

all aboard the gravy train …

Ad for Corsair II camera in the September, 1941 issue of Popular Mechanics

Toronto. In September of 1941, America had not yet joined in the War in Europe that had been underway for two years, in spite of Churchill’s pleadings and the US President’s empathy. The loss of German cameras to America seemed imminent, sparking an out pouring of unique designs – that and the introduction of a rather fussy and pricey Kodachrome transparency film a couple of years earlier.

One of the protagonists of this design cornucopia was the fabled ‘Universal Camera Company’ of NYC (soon to become a Chicago entity). The firm identified all the pitfalls affecting colour photography and 35mm cameras.

To solve these identified afflictions, they announced a remarkable camera called the ‘Corsair II‘ that purported to ‘think for itself’ – and for just $20 US.

The company portrayed the camera as being the camera for colour, ‘ “Mistake-proof” features make it the ideal color camera. The essentials of successful color photography … accurate shutter speeds … correct exposure over entire picture area … and exposure meter … are all built-in features. Nothing more to buy, except film!’

If this Bakelite wonder is unfamiliar to you , check out the instruction manual here courtesy of Mr Butkus in NJ. And visit our fairs and auctions to find this and other Univex cameras.

And a thank you goes to my good friend George Dunbar for suggesting both this and the ad in the previous post on the Kodak Medalist.

Posted in camera | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on all aboard the gravy train …

anything you can do …

Announcing the first Medalist camera

Toronto. … I can do better! Shades of Annie Get Your Gun! In December of 1941 (by the time this issue hit the stands, Pearl Harbor ad been bombed and America was dragged into WW2 kicking and screaming). This issue of Popular Mechanics announced a remarkable new Kodak camera that promised to bring to 620 film the features and benefits found on German imports like Leica, Contax, etc..

Shown here, the photographer has his hand on the ‘fine focus’ knob while using the accessory frosted glass back as a focussing screen. In the article the camera remains unnamed although it is obviously the famous Kodak Medalist (I) which stayed in production from 1941 – 1948 when the (II) replaced it. During WW2, the camera was customized for the military with a black anodized coating. According to McKeown, this coating drifted over to early post war cameras too.

Note. The title is a line from a 1946 song by Irving Berlin featured in the Broadway musical which became a film musical four years later, “Annie Get Your Gun” sung here by Howard Keel and Betty Hutton.

Posted in camera | Tagged , , | Comments Off on anything you can do …

it’s a barnum and bailey world

Phineas and Charlie from a Smithsonian copy of a Daguerreotype photograph

Toronto. Collectors of images may find new additions for their collections at the Port Colborne auction today. The two day event (Saturday and Sunday) honours the memory of PHSC member, auction coordinator, and 1st VP, the late John Kantymir. All lots in this event are from the Kantymir collection.

My good friend, George Dunbar sent along this image of a beautiful daguerreotype of Phineas T Barnum and his protege, ‘General Tom Thumb‘ A.K.A. Charles Sherwood Stratton. At the time, daguerreotype portraits were expensive and likely personal keepsakes. NB. the history of the circus, including Barnum’s involvement, can be read at this Wikipedia Link.

Years later, people like General Tom were captured on wet or dry plates and then cabinet card size copies were cheaply made and widely distributed to advertise the person as the late Michael Mitchell explained to us back in March 1980 and later in  October 2003.

NOTE: The title of this post is a line in “It’s Only a Paper Moon” sung here by the great Nat King Cole.

Posted in photos | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on it’s a barnum and bailey world

transitions

1mm ring and bayonet rear lens cap from 1960s – 70s

Toronto. After recovering from WW2, Leitz embarked on their famous M series bayonet mount cameras with the extremely popular M3 camera. Like many leading manufacturers, Leitz was aware of their strong base of owners of the older screw mount cameras. They tackled the transition from screw to bayonet mount lenses and cameras in many ways.

The last screw mount camera model, the IIIg was sold alongside the M3 and introduced a few of the M3’s  features. Buyers of a Leica could buy either the M series or the IIIg.

While the screw mount Leicas were slimmer than the slightly larger M series cameras, the film plane to lens mount distance was actually one mm longer. The 28.8mm screw mount distance became 27.8mm in the M series. This allowed a 1mm thick ring to be added to an M series camera lens mount, converting it for use with older screw mount lenses. This meant owners with screw mount lenses could use them on the newer M series cameras.

You may have noticed that the earlier M series black Bakelite rear lens caps have three odd tabs moulded on their outer back. Did you ever wonder why? They were actually a three tab wrench! Occasionally the 1mm ring converting bayonet to screw mount got stuck on the camera. This ‘wrench’ could make fast work  of removing the ring. Of course, if the ring was stuck to the lens, a cloth between hand and ring made short work of freeing it up.

Also, most rings are marked with a lens focal length. The ring would lock in the correct bright line in the viewfinder of the M series camera corresponding to the chosen lens! Anyone not that fussy could use any of this line of rings to convert a screw mount lens (and some lens accessories) to bayonet mount Leicas.

 

Posted in camera | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on transitions