OMG OM-D

bye bye Olympus cameras

Toronto. Olympus cameras have been around since 1936. Their big fresh egg last century was small SLR film cameras when most film SLRS were huge machines. The famous Japanese optical house founded in 1919 made many other instruments including well respected light microscopes.

I was sad to learn that Olympus has ended its camera business, selling it off to Japan Industrial Partners (JIP), the firm who bought Sony’s computer business a few years back. The deal was announced this past Wednesday and will complete this coming September. The Olympus line is the latest to fall victim to the evolution of smart phone digital cameras. With every smart phone coming equipped with a camera that will take very good photos, a standalone camera becomes unnecessary unless you are a professional taking photos beyond those suitable for smart phone cameras.

My iPod Touch has an 8MP camera with a lens equivalent to a 35mm lens on a 35mm film camera (a lens that I used about 80% of the time in my film days). Today, that little gadget is always nearby while higher resolution, zoom-lens-equipped cameras sit indoors on my shelf. Needless to say, most of my current photos are taken using the iPod Touch, Its simple air play set up sends them to my computer for saving and EXIF key wording via the Apple Photos App.

My thanks to good friend and palate extraordinaire John Morden for bringing this bit of history home via a link here to the web site Review Geek who reference Engadget in the article.

Posted in camera | Tagged , , | Comments Off on OMG OM-D

four, square, and fake?

Kodak Instamatic with flash cube

Toronto. With the ever challenging push for market share, Kodak slayed inept film changing with its Kodapak 126 for Instamatics and the flash bulb fumble with a four pack of mini flash bulbs in its flashcube that goes off and rotates after each shot to offer a fresh bulb along with the fresh frame of film. (Early versions used batteries but later versions (magicubes) were fired mechanically.)

The ad on pp 104-5 in the October 8th, 1965 edition of LIFE magazine demonstrated the simplicity of film changing and flashcubes IF you used the Kodak Instamatic line of cameras, but it also implies to the naive snap-shooter what a great job the little cameras can do. It was likely ads like this that spurred the Truth in Advertising movement (actually safety and unproven health claims took priority).

Professionals looking at the four images can easily see they bear no resemblance whatsoever to photos taken with the tiny camera and its fixed on-camera point source flash. Such a  technique burns the scene close to the camera with over exposure, and leaves the background too dark, with shadows crisp and harsh. Serious photographers routinely used off camera bounce flash or multi-illumination, soft boxes, etc., to give such overall lighting with soft shadows.

My sincere thanks to good friend and fellow PHSC member, George Dunbar for reminding me of this curious bit of history when film was still king and flashcubes were the newest innovation for the family photographer.

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on four, square, and fake?

Amalgamated Photo History Newsletters

Toronto. Since we are unable to hold our regular monthly meetings – the pandemic dropped the curtain on us – members received this pdf version of the amalgamated newsletters from our exchange members who gave their blessing for inclusion in this venture.

I hinted this package was coming in my June 18, 2020 post, “coping with COVID“. In that post I mention, ” … we elected to compile other material in pdf files ready to send to members IF they supplied an email address AND had a fast enough internet connection to receive the 2mb or so pdf files. …”.

Well, the file (just over 7 MB, not 2 MB) went out this morning as promised. If you didn’t get it and get our newsletters, drop me a note (news@phsc.ca). I will verify you are a 2020/2021 member and send off a copy. If you are a current member and didn’t see a copy, please check your junk folder. This and all other specials will only be sent to paid members. Not one yet? No big deal – pull your plastic and use the PayPal set up at the top right of this web page.

Posted in journal | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Amalgamated Photo History Newsletters

Jack be nimble

Jack gets ready

Toronto. The Donald upset many high level politicians. He dissed friendly states and embraced enemy states. He told porkies galore. He is reviled by many in his own party. His idea of reconciliation is to blame everything on the opposition or on leaders of friendly countries.

Shown here is a photo op taken with the North Korean dictator. A videographer seems to be ready and a stills photographer is caught literally leaping into position. Our esteemed leader to the south couldn’t be puffed up more… We can accept many things from the US given its version of democracy (at least to those of us familiar with the Canadian version), but when top Republicans go on record and abandon ship (or are pushed), things begin to smell up here when a south wind blows.

Thanks again to my good friend George Dunbar for sharing this whimsical bit of history with me and the photographic fraternity in general. On a side note, like many Canadians, I too have relatives that came from the USA, lived there, or are there now. And we are always envious of the American retail business and their propensity to innovate so many things we use and take for granted.

 

Posted in history | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Jack be nimble

good money after bad

Fall 1965 American Ad for Agfa-Gevaert deal

Toronto. This is what we said when someone spent added money on a lost cause. Sometimes a better way didn’t gain traction in the marketplace and fell in the dustbin of history. This happened to Agfa-Gevaert’s rapid film system. When introduced as a competitor to Kodak’s 126  Instamatic film pack Kodapak, the rapid 35mm system was technically superior. It had a smaller cassette, no reel, and used a camera’s film plate to ensure the film was flat to the film plane.

BUT Kodak was a preeminent force in photography at the time. Both systems demanded new cameras, and were not compatible with then current models. The powerful Kodak brand was placed on many low end Instamatic cameras and the corporation slowly won over the market place.

As shown on page 20 in the September 17, 1965 ad from LIFE magazine, Agfa tossed another free 30,000 rapid cameras into the mix (limited to selected American states). The camera model it chose competed directly with the Instamatic. As a rough guess the $14.95 retail price would mean a factory cost of about $3.00 per camera or some $90,000 or more plus S&H, marketing, etc. No small sum in 1965.

It seemed nearly every home had an Instamatic. Hardly anyone had a rapid film camera. … In less than a decade the rapid system disappeared. My thanks once again to good friend George Dunbar for his diligent investigation of this tidbit of long forgotten (collectors excepted) photographic history.

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on good money after bad

that’s the spirit

The Spirit of Fact – Southworth and Hawes of Boston

Toronto.  Within a year of the January 1839 announcement of Daguerre’s process in Paris, the new way to create images was known world-wide. By the early 1840s every major city had a daguerreotype portrait studio.

Boston was no different. The works of Southworth and Hawes (S&H) were known through out America. In 1976, a high quality edition of their selected work (1943-1862) was reproduced by David R Godine of Boston and the IMP at George Eastman House (GEH) using the GEH (now known as George Eastman Museum) archive of originals from the S&H studios. Some years later a Dover reproduction was release but with half size images and less faithful reproduction to the originals.

A selection of quality images were also included in Grant Romer’s book “Young America“.

This Saturday, the Daguerreian Society feature an online lecture on S&H, “About a 1 hour conversation on Southworth and Hawes by Mike Robinson and Grant Romer drawing from the collection at The George Eastman House.

“The lecture will be on Saturday, June 27th at 1:30 PM EST. The $25 fee for the talk is fully tax deductible contribution to the Daguerreian Society.  On Saturday morning at 9am all participants will receive an email with the Zoom information including a passcode that we ask you not to share. You will receive a second reminder email at 1pm.

“We are using PayPal so please remember to check your PayPal email address or send us an email you would like to be contacted with by The Daguerreian Society.”

Posted in book | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on that’s the spirit

colour quartet

Flower c2008 digital photo.

Toronto. The earliest photos were monochrome – unless hand coloured. By the turn of the 20th century, colour photos could be taken using three black and white films sandwiched together and interspersed with colour layers. The additive colour system created transparencies while the subtractive system created colour negatives to print on colour paper.

One of the earliest commercial successes was the c1900 Autochrome glass slides sold by the Lumière Brothers of France. While only a single glass pate was used, dyed potato grains created the colours. Colour processes faced a quartet of issues: speed, resolution, fidelity, and permanence. The light from the scene had to go through many layers resulting in very low ASA ratings. In the late 1950s, Kodachrome slide film reached ASA 10 and had to be used only in sunshine! Other slide films reached an ASA of 32, but that too was better used outdoors.

The processes like autochromes were clearly low resolution since every filter was a tiny potato grain. While the mid 20th century colour films relied on dyes and colour couplers, the absence or intensity of the dyes were determined by their respective films, so grain did enter the question. Kodachrome and the other slide films were slow speed but high resolution. Colour negatives and prints on the other hand were faster but remained rather low resolution options until the 1970s or so. Detail and colour appeared to be trade-offs.

Similarly, in that era, colour fidelity was an issue. Film types were chosen for their beautiful and realistic renderings. No one film accurately captured every colour in a scene. Kodachrome was touted for the brilliant reds while Ektachrome and the like tended to give better blues and greens. White balance was an issue solved by blue and amber coated flash bulbs, special conversion filters, or colour films intended for use outdoors (blue sunlight) or indoors under incandescent lighting (soft yellowish colour). Enlargers had a wide range of different density filters (Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Red) to balance lighting over all in a print.

The issue of permanence in colour films or paper was never solved before film lost out to digital technology. Some processes used small dye molecules limiting the choice so chemists balanced off fidelity and permanence. Today we live in a digital world where very high ASA (now ISO) ratings are common place and white balance is usually performed automatically. Modern day digital cameras (either stand alone or in smart phones) make correct colour rendering a snap – but framing, sharpness, subject matter, etc. remain issues for amateurs.

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on colour quartet

its the dye, silly

colour portrait 1970s/1980s

Toronto. In the days of colour film, it was somewhat common knowledge that colour photos faded badly and didn’t last. 60 years ago it was appropriate to get a mix of colour and B&W prints to commemorate special occasions like weddings.

When I was in Labrador in the late 1950s, I used Ansco colour slide film since, like Ektachrome, it could be processed at home. Over time these slides shifted to a purplish colour as the yellow dyes disappeared. Kodachrome slides fared much better but the processing was far too complex and demanding to do at home.

To make fading matters worse, Kodak had switched to using the notoriously poor amateur  Ektacolor paper for its professional prints. Studios were suddenly sued when their expensive wedding prints faded badly. You can read about the studies in the Wilhelm Institute’s epic book “ThePermanence and Care of Color Photographs: Traditional and Digital Color Prints, Color Negatives, Slides, and Motion Picturespublished in 1993 and long out of print. Henry Wihelm still offers a free download of this milestone 700+ page tomb.

Clicking on the small icon at top left will show the original Ansco ad in the September 3, 1965 issue of LIFE magazine on page 82. Thanks to my friend George Dunbar for this bit of photographic history last century.

Posted in history | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on its the dye, silly

hockey and photography? really?

kids playing hockey

Toronto. Well, sports photographers and some news hounds would agree that hockey and photos definitely do mix quite well. In fact, one of our exchange members is the Hockey Hall of Fame (HHoF) here in the Big Smoke. And a few years back, we went to their satellite archives  in Long Branch for a meeting (March, 2013) one chilly evening.

Everybody in this country knows Tim Hortons (or Timmy’s) for coffee and a doughnut. But not all know of the tragic death of this famous NHL player. Brad Lombardo remedies this with a book about six NHL players who died a tragic death while still on an NHL team.

His book, “From Triumph to Tragedy In The NHL” is covered on this site, including how you can order it in hard copy or as an electronic file. The book uses Lombardo’s prose plus photographs from the HHoF archives.

NB. I snapped the above photo of one of my grandson’s (in blue) a while back (about eight years ago) using a Sony digital camera and an old Leica lens joined together with an adaptor bought online from a store in Hong Kong.

Posted in history | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on hockey and photography? really?

Managing, cataloging, storing, and digitizing your daguerreotype collection

Daugerreian Society Lectures

Toronto. The above title is quite a mouthful! As announced for today by the Daguerreian Society, it is, ” A one hour presentation with Mike Robinson on digitizing your daguerreotypes, followed by Len Walle and Phil Nathanson discussing how to manage, catalog and store your photographic collections.

“These topic are some of our most asked about subjects in the Facebook group. If you aren’t a member the group you are missing a wealth of information daily about daguerreotypes and other pre 1870s images.

“The lecture is today at 1:30 PM EST. The $25 fee for the talk is a fully tax deductible [USA taxes] contribution to the Daguerreian Society.  This morning all participants will receive an email with the Zoom information including a passcode that we ask you not to share.

Posted in activities-other | Tagged , | Comments Off on Managing, cataloging, storing, and digitizing your daguerreotype collection