Toronto. … our spring auction (May 4th), of course. See the poster below for times and place. Email Clint at auction@phsc.ca with your questions (poster is jpeg and as such sans links).

poster for the May 4, 2025 PHSC Spring Auction
Toronto. … our spring auction (May 4th), of course. See the poster below for times and place. Email Clint at auction@phsc.ca with your questions (poster is jpeg and as such sans links).
poster for the May 4, 2025 PHSC Spring Auction
Toronto. Who can forget comedian Lily Tomlin and her hilarious send up of the telephone company?
Leitz often separated the lens assembly from the focussing mount. To use the lens on the bellows, a ring would connect the lens (or lens head) to the front of the bellows.
At the rear, a Visoflex mirror box would join the camera body to the bellows allowing the assembly to be focussed and framed. Depending on the choice of ring/lens or lens head, the bellows could focus very close or to infinity.
In the photo at left, the ring on the right connects the 9cm f/2 lens head to the bellows II while the ring on the left connects any M camera lens – focussing mount and all to the bellows II.
Be sure to visit our 2025 events (see PHSC EVENTS at right). There will be many items there to perk your interest and complement your collection! The next event is our spring auction on May 4th. Event questions may be addressed to Clint at fair@phsc.ca.
Toronto. Greek mythology had the Cyclopes – a gang of scary giants with one eye in the middle of the forehead! Issue 23-3 uses a photo of an unusual “three-eye” turret device mounted on a Leica camera as its cover shot.
The third party device allows fast changing amongst three different lenses. Shown here mounted on a Leica IIIC, the photo is described as, ” A Leica IIIC (Wartime) camera body with a [Leitz] look-a-like HABER & FINK three-lens turret facilitating an easy choice of screw-mount lenses. [Member] S. Chen shows it with a 50mm Summicron, a 90mm “fat” Elmar and one empty location.”
The turret was an effort to allow rapid change in lens focal length long before Zoom lenses became practical for the average photographer. The device seems to have had limited success and disappeared before any Leitz accessory version was made. In the 1950s, 35mm still zooms were exotic, slow, expensive and had a very short focal length range. Movie zooms covering a smaller half frame (1×3/4 inch) were around much earlier.
All this changed a decade or two later when third party lens makers in Asia designed, manufactured and sold far more reasonable zoom lenses. Modern day digital cameras usually come with a zoom lens. My old Sony F828 camera has a Zeiss zoom built in. Typical of zoom designs, this lens has serious geometric distortion – especially at either end of its focal length range.
A separate French computer program (DxO) ‘straightened’ the distortion with dramatic results. For some years now such digital correction has been automatic.
Visit our 2025 events (see PHSC EVENTS at right) to find interesting items for your collection. Next up is our May 4th auction. Questions? Email Clint at fair@phsc.ca.
Along the Teslin Trail, Faith and party inspect a Klondiker’s wheelbarrow used to replace a mule. – $140
Toronto. in issue 23-2, Bob Lansdale writes an auction topic titled, “Waddington’s Marks 100th Anniversary of the Klondike”. Many of us think about the romance of the Klondike gold rush in the Yukon territory in the late 1800s.
Bob was reviewing a book by Jill Downie (Passionate Pen) and begins his article, “Waddington’s in Toronto have auctioned an extraordinary collection of photographs, correspondence and personal memorabilia on the centenary of the Klondike Gold Rush. The material was brought to light by author Jill Downie while collecting biographic details for a book on Faith Fenton, an unsung heroine of Canada’s late 19th century.
“She defied conventions and restrictions placed on her gender, to become a monumental figure in the shaping of this country. With the completion of the book, family descendants chose to disperse the collection via Waddington’s at a time that proved auspicious to the Klondike anniversary.
“The book, Passionate Pen, reveals the life struggle of Alice Freeman (1857-1936), brought up in the Ontario communities of Bowmanville and Barrie. She became an underpaid school teacher for 19 years in Toronto’s lower-class industrial area of Front and Sherbourne Sts. It was a time when women’s place was in the home; schoolteaching served as a job of convenience until marriage would hopefully replace it.
“But Alice developed a hidden persona writing a column in the 1880’s for the Barrie paper, Northern Advance, under the romantic nom-de-plume of STELLA.” …
Bob Lansdale’s article in full, plus other articles appear in the issue 23-2 pdf on the free members only DVD/thumb drive. Not a member? Then join now (see MEMBERSHIP above and at right). If you have any membership questions email our membership secretary Lilianne at member@phsc.ca.
Toronto. My friend and fellow PHSC member, Gary Perry, sent me an email recently to say his latest personal fair – CAMERAMA – will be on June 8th as noted below. For information, email Gary at cameramashow@gmail.com – the text below is a jpeg and as such has no active links.
Camerama June 8, 2025
Toronto. I bought my first 35mm camera – a Minolta Super A around the late 1950s. I was amazed at the clarity of the f/2 Rokkor lens. About a year later I moved on to an SLR Exakta. It had a relatively huge view through its waist level viewer.
My wonderful Exakta developed a serious shutter issue so I picked up an older used one. Focussing, especially for normal and wide angle lenses in less than bright light was growing difficult as my eyes aged. Design for shorter focal length lenses was complex as the designer had to allow the SLR’s mirror to move freely while allowing the lens to focus to infinity.
In 1973, I bought the massive 15th edition of the Leica giving me a great resource for reviewing Leica features by model. Shortly thereafter, I bought a Leica M4 with a 5cm f/2 lens and later a 35mm f/2 lens as well.
Other lenses I picked up were all used, some with anti-reflection coatings, some without. I joined the then nascent PHSC to find more used lenses and accessories. I became intrigued with photo history and other kinds of cameras. Suddenly I was a camera collector!
The other day, Clint dropped off a bag of Leica gear ready to be auctioned. To my surprise, included was an M4 body like mine, but manufactured earlier in 1968/9 (auction lot 862). Cameras like the M4 (and lots of other photo collectibles) often show up at our events (see PHSC EVENTS at right). You can email our president Clint at fair@phsc.ca if you have any questions. The next event is our May 4th auction.
While you are here, why not join the PHSC? See MEMBERSHIP above and at right. Any membership questions can be emailed to our membership secretary Lilianne at member@phsc.ca.
NB. The title of this post is a riff on the title of a 1988 movie, “The Accidental Tourist“.
Toronto. You may have wondered about so called Canadian cameras. They seem to cluster around two points: cheap and inexpensive cameras (mostly box cameras), and high end models (Leica cameras and lenses once from Midland).
Some years ago, member John Linsky researched the Marksman line of (box) cameras sold mainly in the late 1940s and early 1950s. John’s efforts, have been updated and revised in a detailed article by members David J. Kenny (DDS, PhD) and Louise Freyburger (MLS)
A draft of their article (final version to be published in issue 50-4) begins, “Louise Freyburger and I were discussing ‘Canadian’ cameras when she reminded me of Linsky’s article on the Marksman, produced by Bernard Marks & Co., (BMCo), Toronto. This small, steel-bodied box camera was the sort of ‘toy’ camera given to children and adolescents for birthdays and Christmas. BMCo was primarily a manufacturer’s agent, also called a jobber or wholesaler, selling a variety of products to department stores and independent retailers.
“John Linsky’s short description contains by far the most information on Marks’ cameras in the literature. He reported that the company was, ‘solely owned by Bernard Marks who provided this information.’ Further, Marks designed the camera himself, and all parts, including lens and shutter, were made by an associated company. The cameras had only ‘Time’ and ‘Snap’ settings, a fixed f16 aperture, and used 620 roll film.
“As limited as Linsky’s first person description of Marks’ enterprise is, it offers far more information than is currently captured by Internet search engines. The only other written account of Marksman cameras was taken from, and acknowledged, the Linsky article. We decided to extend Linsky’s narrative by investigating this kernel of Canadian photographic history. Photography websites and eBay offerings provided additional visual information, and we used secondary sources, including a fellow Society member, along with direct examination and disassembly of the Marksman variants.” …
This article in full, plus other articles will appear in issue 50-4. Members will receive notification of issue 50-4 in pdf format shortly. Not a member? Then join now (see MEMBERSHIP above and at right). If you have any membership questions email our membership secretary Lilianne at member@phsc.ca.
Cameras like this (and lots of other photo collectibles) often show up at our events (see PHSC EVENTS at right). You can email our president Clint at fair@phsc.ca if you have any questions. The next event is our May 4th auction.
Toronto. Early to mid last century professionals used larger glass plates or cut film to create photographs. Most prints were contact prints making ‘dodge’ and ‘burn’ to adjust exposure and contrast impractical. Instead, professionals would have staff use a retouching ‘desk’ and tools to add the changes directly on the negative.
Our one-time editor, the late Ev Roseborough often saw just such a desk used and in issue 23-2 (fall of 1997) he wrote an article titled, “Observations on the Old and Gentle Art of Portrait Negative Retouching”.
Ev begins his article, ” Retouchers, as I knew them in the early 30s, with few exceptions were maiden ladies in frilly blouses and gold spectacles who sat in a darkened corner. There they worked their way through countless films in the delicately perfumed atmosphere of turpentine varnish with a trace of lavender.
“Dry plates were still in use, although Eastman Super and ParSpeed portrait film negatives received most of their ministrations. Portrait films were orthochromatic with the consequent exaggeration of reddish complexions and blemishes. Supersensitive Pan overcorrected without makeup and Portrait Pan, although excellent, was not popular because inspection under dim safelight during development was difficult.
“Female retouchers were sometimes also the receptionists in small studios; in larger establishments several would be employed at desks behind a dark curtain and rarely saw the light of day. They often married the proprietors.
“There were only a few male retouchers, mostly free-lance, who would call several times a week at the studio to pick-up and deliver. Each knew how much work the individual photographer expected done on a head. Payment was often based on the dime or quarter sized head, which is what they were paid.
“When sitters returned the daylight (red) proofs, major surgery such as opening of drooping eyelids, straightening of a crooked nose or slimming very full lips would be marked. Routine was the removal of skin blemishes and stray hair, cross eyes, bags under the eyes, mouth corners and wrinkles. A skillful photographer rarely needed cross eye retouching. Discretion was the better part of valour, often overlooked; thus we have many [prints of] bland, expressionless faces with pearly skin.” …
Collectors interested in both the old film technology like the retouching desk and the newer digital gear visit our events (see PHSC EVENTS at right) and join our society (see MEMBERSHIP above and at right). For questions related to the events, email our president Clint at fair@phsc.ca and for membership questions email our membership secretary Lilianne at member@phsc.ca. The next event (May 4th) is our spring auction.
Toronto. In a recent post I discussed techniques used on post washed prints to remove any excess water and treat the surface. The effect of ignoring post washing processes on film – especially 35mm or smaller – is even more drastic.
Surface tension causes droplets of water to cling to the film and once evaporated, these droplets leave a mark on the film – especially if the water or air or both are impure.
This can be solved by using a wetting agent in the wash bath to ease the natural surface tension. Kodak uses the trade mark ‘Photo-Flo‘ on its product. So all you film niche folk, be aware of how you can ensure your negatives are as clean was possible before enlarging.
By the way, the phenomenon of water tension and wetting agents is aptly handled by this 5 minute Youtube video. And remember, visit our 2025 events (see PHSC EVENTS at right) for additions to your collection and user gear.
Toronto. Like many antiques, old photographs tend to appreciate with age. The value of a specific photograph depends on many factors: condition, process used, subject (famous? pedestrian? newsworthy? etc.), current interest, studio, turnover, …
A note from past president, sports photographer, and author, Les Jones , titled, “Driving up the price of a Lincoln” contains only the glass-plate photo of Mr Lincoln with a link to Kovels Antique Trader website.
On the site, copy editor, “Elizabeth Heineman” wrote a brief article about this restored glass-plate image of a young Lincoln. Older members will recall a talk in 2002 by Grant Romer of GEH, who did the restoration. The plate comes from a portrait once used for a campaign poster. The plate to be auctioned was made decades after Mr Lincoln’s tragic death. While we ‘think’ as collectors of photos, other kinds of collectors might bid for this photo too such as collectors of Lincoln memorabilia, US Presidents memorabilia, etc. and feel the estimated price is indeed reasonable.
The surprising asking price before auction resonated with me in a way. In a recent post, I commented on the shift in value (see “t’row da book at him“) especially due to turnover (each ‘owner’ expects the item to appreciate).
In this case the subject is well known but I was surprise that a ‘restored’ glass plate photo would attract such a price from any collector group. Moral of the story – hang on to your photos of famous people (and visit our events this year as listed under PHSC EVENTS at right).